GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script CPUTR 2008 chat thread... - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CPUTR 2008 chat thread...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fredbare
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Thank you in2deep, will do that then. I have read that you should send them unaltered, do I leave on, names addresses account numbers balance etc.

    Wiull take a little time to scan and send.

    Thank you

    Fredbare

    Leave a comment:


  • Deepie
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by fredbare View Post
    No I havent Vint, I didnt know if I had to be asked before I did that. Do you think he would mind, it would help to have his opinion as 2 are in court already.

    Thank you

    Fredbare
    It's fine to send to Niddy------>agreements@all-about-debt.co.uk

    Leave a comment:


  • fredbare
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    No I havent Vint, I didnt know if I had to be asked before I did that. Do you think he would mind, it would help to have his opinion as 2 are in court already.

    Thank you

    Fredbare

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by fredbare View Post
    Hi Vint nice to see you too, I havebeen following your threads for a long time. It is nice here and hope Niddy can help me sometime with my agreements as I havent had them looked at by an expert but they are the same as a lot of other peoples and they were told they were UE so I am assuming mine are too, hopefully.

    I have no intention of ripping the other site to pieces as they were the first to help me out at a bad time and I still appreciate that but it has changed a lot and I dont feel welcome there anymore. I do here.

    All the best

    Fredbare
    Indeed,

    Have you sent your agreements to Niddy?

    Link here mailto:agreements@all-about-debt.co.uk or in his signature.
    Last edited by vint1954; 31 May 2012, 13:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • fredbare
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Hi Vint nice to see you too, I havebeen following your threads for a long time. It is nice here and hope Niddy can help me sometime with my agreements as I havent had them looked at by an expert but they are the same as a lot of other peoples and they were told they were UE so I am assuming mine are too, hopefully.

    I have no intention of ripping the other site to pieces as they were the first to help me out at a bad time and I still appreciate that but it has changed a lot and I dont feel welcome there anymore. I do here.

    All the best

    Fredbare

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by fredbare View Post
    Hi

    I was also receiving help from the other site and they were very good with me in the beginning for which I will always be grateful, unfortunately when it came to court and I asked for help with the defence I had no replies and felt abandoned. The advice I eventually got was to arrange a payment plan with my creditors as I was a debt avoider, however a few of the members jumped in and supported me and told me what to do and I cant thank them enough, I would have have had 2 ccj by now if it wrent for them, you know who you are, I found this site by googling for something else and found quite a lot of the other site members werre here.

    I dont post a lot as there a a lot of people in worse situations than me and need more help but the information I have gained from this site has helped me enormously. So a big thank you to the site and to the members of the other place who are here now and helped me when I needed it most.

    Sorry that was a bit long winded but its how I feel.

    Fredbare
    Hi Fredbare,

    It's good to see you over here. Niddy has a good grasp on UE agreements and always willing to help and kill situations.

    It's a totally different atmosphere here.

    I have had my say on the other palce, so no more comment from me.

    Vint

    Leave a comment:


  • fredbare
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Hi

    I was also receiving help from the other site and they were very good with me in the beginning for which I will always be grateful, unfortunately when it came to court and I asked for help with the defence I had no replies and felt abandoned. The advice I eventually got was to arrange a payment plan with my creditors as I was a debt avoider, however a few of the members jumped in and supported me and told me what to do and I cant thank them enough, I would have have had 2 ccj by now if it wrent for them, you know who you are, I found this site by googling for something else and found quite a lot of the other site members werre here.

    I dont post a lot as there a a lot of people in worse situations than me and need more help but the information I have gained from this site has helped me enormously. So a big thank you to the site and to the members of the other place who are here now and helped me when I needed it most.

    Sorry that was a bit long winded but its how I feel.

    Fredbare

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Yes or you would have had a smacked bum

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Never let it be said that good advice is not given on Cag






    Just ashame there is so much crap on it as well...is it on your credit file indeed!

    FP just Pm'd you, might want to check it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    If i hadnt found this site, by pure luck while searching UE, my mother would prob have a CCJ from DLC re MBNA by now also.

    They threatend all sorts at the start, and took it as far as a letter from their solicitors, if it wasnt for this forum helping me to understand UE, they would never have backed down. I dont even hear a dickybird from them now thanks to this place.

    I dont know if the other forums are funded in someway by credit card companies or what not, but if there is a connection then you can see why its not full impartial advise.

    You wouldnt go to a solicitor employed by the same company seeking a claim against you, so why should consumer debt forums be any different.

    Its typical, of a "problem, reaction, Solution" situation, whereby they create a problem, then comes the reaction, and they offer the solution, to the problem they created.

    What they dont want, is other forums, like this, being able to show another solution to the one they were gunning for.

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Preaching to the converted.
    It is very sad that they act the way they do.
    If I hadn't gone onto MSE I would never have been redirected here and I would probably have a collection of CCJ's by now .

    It's not just the visable practicalities that people on here care about either, nor is it their own ego.

    Anyway time to get moving, catch a train and greet the beloved who has spent the last two weeks in SF and Las Vegas (bar steward)

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by Flowerpower
    I started in 2010 and found a casual mention of this site on there last year, before they had all the filters in place. I then did so much 'pointing' they blocked almost every avenue.

    Although this may all sound like a silly little game of inter-forum rivalry, it is NOT! Very soon, someone will be getting a £17k CCJ, possibly a CO, for an account where no CCA was provided. Given the amount, they may even try for an Order for Sale

    I posted a reference to this forum hoping the OP would see it before it got swiftly removed and replaced with the usual question about 6 years (which had been asked and answered earlier) . That sounds like all the opposite of help for the consumer.
    No FP. I realise that it is not just rivalry. There is a marked difference between the sites. The other place was once described by a judge as being like mates chatting down the pub. Well the not only is there a conversation ban at the pub, but they are selecting customers.

    What was the thread FP?

    Anyway, onward with CPUTR and it's criminal offence teeth.

    Vint

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by jon1965 View Post
    Bad Niddy for wondering such a thing

    Is that the case about bank charges , you know those things that they still tell people to reclaim
    It's an obsession

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by PriorityOne View Post
    This seemed to coincide with the elevation of a couple of members to mod status..... who between them, sowed the seeds of the credit file fetish that still goes on there to this day....

    And the permitted posting of known DCA's

    People started to be labelled as debt avoiders.... more so after Waksman (Carey et al)...... or so it seemed.

    Again, the infiltration of undesireables

    FP... why can't I shake my jugs like that?!
    Keep practicing

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008 (ex P1 CAG CPUTR 2008)

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Before 2011 - we have been here since 2010 (see my join date opposite) and CAG wanted nothing to do with UE back then!

    It was when the OFT lost the big case and gander realised he wouldn't become rich overnight that things changed.

    * One wonders if that house he does interviews from is paid for using pretentious funds from assumptions of donations that never was!
    Indeed Niddy.

    I started the journy as it were in 2009. I unfortunately did not find AAD until poionted here a few weeks back.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X