Some current guidance

[mystery1]

Re: Some current guidance

its para 3.10 of PD 22 that you need M1:

"3.10 A legal representative who signs a statement of truth must sign in his own name and not that of his firm or employer."

An application can be made fro an Unless Order with a Strike out in default. That is likely to have a greater chance of success than a straight strike out. Ask them to replead and sign property and to disclose documents to comply with CCA (if a request was made under s77/78). In default of which they get struck out. It fulfillls the overriding objective by narrowing the issues and disposing of the claim early if it has no merit so saving court time being wasted in either instance by either a shorted more focused trial or no trial at all.

I knew that but just forgot to put it on. I've posted that precise pd rule a few times

M1

[Curlyben]

Re: Some current guidance

Well the silence is deafening...
Another letter from Cabot demanding payment, but nowt from court, no matter...