Hi again,
Just to expand on what has been said, and also something I missed out from my previous post;
A contract between one creditor for the alleged assignment of debts to another, generally contain a term that the original creditor undertakes to continue to forward any payments received. If it goes on for a while, you may get a letter from Tesco pleading with you to stop paying them. However, they still retain a duty to forward anything they receive.
In terms of whether or not Intrum are happy to let you continue to make token payments; Again, generally under an alleged assignment the assignee (Intrum in this case) agrees to accept any existing payment arrangement currently in place as at the date of the alleged assignment, for a period of 6 months only.
I obviously can't see that letter any more, but I recall seeing something to that effect said in one of the letters you put up. Albeit, I see so many Notices of Assignment on a daily basis and have had such a large influx of new cases I am instructed in recently, that I may be thinking of someone else's file.
The effect of that, is that Intrum may contact you in 6 months time and seek to coax you into 'upping' your monthly payment. There is really no way of knowing that at this stage as it is a future event yet to take place.
Obviously the actual date of alleged assignment is yet to be established owing to the discrepancy in the notices. So this may challenge the 6 month starting point.
In any event, I'd suggest you hold fire and await their next move which, if they have agreed to accept whatever payment is being made for 6 months, which will probably be the case, may not be until 6 months down the line and will likely be a 'hey, remember us' letter.
There is no urgency or need to panic at this stage...Just ask you mum to stay vigilant to new items of post!
Just to expand on what has been said, and also something I missed out from my previous post;
A contract between one creditor for the alleged assignment of debts to another, generally contain a term that the original creditor undertakes to continue to forward any payments received. If it goes on for a while, you may get a letter from Tesco pleading with you to stop paying them. However, they still retain a duty to forward anything they receive.
In terms of whether or not Intrum are happy to let you continue to make token payments; Again, generally under an alleged assignment the assignee (Intrum in this case) agrees to accept any existing payment arrangement currently in place as at the date of the alleged assignment, for a period of 6 months only.
I obviously can't see that letter any more, but I recall seeing something to that effect said in one of the letters you put up. Albeit, I see so many Notices of Assignment on a daily basis and have had such a large influx of new cases I am instructed in recently, that I may be thinking of someone else's file.
The effect of that, is that Intrum may contact you in 6 months time and seek to coax you into 'upping' your monthly payment. There is really no way of knowing that at this stage as it is a future event yet to take place.
Obviously the actual date of alleged assignment is yet to be established owing to the discrepancy in the notices. So this may challenge the 6 month starting point.
In any event, I'd suggest you hold fire and await their next move which, if they have agreed to accept whatever payment is being made for 6 months, which will probably be the case, may not be until 6 months down the line and will likely be a 'hey, remember us' letter.
There is no urgency or need to panic at this stage...Just ask you mum to stay vigilant to new items of post!
Comment