GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

    I rather fear that you may have to pay the buggers for now and then try to get your money back later.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

      Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
      I rather fear that you may have to pay the buggers for now and then try to get your money back later.
      I was hoping for a better result than that lol,think i may wait to they come and tell them to do one or i'll throw them down the stairs backwards

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

        Originally posted by M4D YN View Post
        I was hoping for a better result than that lol,think i may wait to they come and tell them to do one or i'll throw them down the stairs backwards
        What stairs?

        Do you have stairs outside your dwelling house?

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

          Originally posted by M4D YN View Post
          i may wait to they come and tell them to do one or i'll throw them down the stairs backwards
          OR you could give us a little more information on the alleged debt so we can maybe give you a reason to lawfully frustrate the visit scheduled for next Wednesday?

          Seriously, if you don't owe the money then you don't owe the money.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

            Originally posted by PlanB View Post
            I have no idea whether you can pay the amount claimed in order to prevent these thugs taking ... TV away
            Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
            It would be a truly remarkable flat screen TV if it were kept outwith the OP's dwelling house.
            Originally posted by PlanB View Post
            Well, I did think the "outwith" word might be an issue.
            "Outwith" just means that only goods outside the dwelling house can be seized, providing those goods are not otherwise considered exempt, and that no application has been made for an Extraordinary Attachment Order that would allow the baboons to force entry into the dwelling house.

            Television receivers are, however, exempted by Schedule 2 of the Act (link)

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

              Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
              What stairs?

              Do you have stairs outside your dwelling house?

              Well if there coming to my house,i stay in a flat and have the stairs in the close to throw the m down

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                Thanks so much for all the help guys,means a lot

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                  Originally posted by PlanB View Post
                  OR you could give us a little more information on the alleged debt so we can maybe give you a reason to lawfully frustrate the visit scheduled for next Wednesday?

                  Seriously, if you don't owe the money then you don't owe the money.

                  What other info could i supply??

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                    "Outwith" just means that only goods outside the dwelling house can be seized
                    So the OP could park his car in his upstairs spare bedroom to avoid seizure?

                    I read somewhere on Google (so not reliable) that Sheriff Officers (Scotland) can enter a home and seize stuff even if the owner is absent (i.e. break in). Is this true?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                      Originally posted by M4D YN View Post
                      Thanks so much for all the help guys,means a lot
                      It's what we do

                      I'm logging off now but I'll be back tomorrow.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                        Originally posted by PlanB View Post
                        It's what we do

                        I'm logging off now but I'll be back tomorrow.
                        Nighty night

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                          Originally posted by PlanB View Post
                          So the OP could park his car in his upstairs spare bedroom to avoid seizure?
                          Yes. Or in his bathroom...

                          I read somewhere on Google (so not reliable) that Sheriff Officers (Scotland) can enter a home and seize stuff even if the owner is absent (i.e. break in). Is this true?
                          Yes and no - read Part 3 (link) of the Act. There are certain legal niceties that should be followed.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                            Im a bit confused, or maybe just haven't read the thread correctly. The op seems to have the opinion that nothing should have been claimed, we have established that its probably unoccupied non domestic rates, but the op hasn't actually made it clear whether their name was on a lease or not.

                            I don't actually think the landlord has done anything wrong here, unless you can tell me that the lease had expired, been made void, the debt is owed.

                            Im not trying to be nasty, but complaining the landlord has issued a summons for money due when you owed it, isn't exactly unfair. Of course we will try and help you as much we can, but lets keep this in the context it should be in.
                            I'm an official AAD Moderator and also a volunteer, here to help make the forum run smoothly. Any views or opinions are mine and not the official line of AAD. Similarly, any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional - Find a Solicitor or go to the National Probono Centre.

                            If you spot an abusive or libellous post then please report it by Clicking Here. If you need to contact me, for instance if I've issued you a warning, moved, edited or deleted your post, please send me a message by clicking my username.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                              Originally posted by SXGuy View Post
                              Im a bit confused, or maybe just haven't read the thread correctly. The op seems to have the opinion that nothing should have been claimed, we have established that its probably unoccupied non domestic rates, but the op hasn't actually made it clear whether their name was on a lease or not.

                              I don't actually think the landlord has done anything wrong here, unless you can tell me that the lease had expired, been made void, the debt is owed.

                              Im not trying to be nasty, but complaining the landlord has issued a summons for money due when you owed it, isn't exactly unfair. Of course we will try and help you as much we can, but lets keep this in the context it should be in.
                              Its the local council that has sent me the letter with the threat of action of sheriff officers to the door if i don't pay the amount of £500 for rates to the privately owned unit i used to have and used to occupy,i had left the unit but they still want the rates for it and it was all down to the word of the ever so corrupt owner of the unit that the council already new about,he also never had any agreement or tenancy on paper,it was based on how long or short we wanted the unit,they were also already investigating him,but will take his lying word over mines,me the tenant that told them they never had a problem before with when the rates were due on the property and for the matter of the landlord doing nothing wrong,ONLY if you were in my position like many other that tried the hardest to run a business from one of very few limited units available in the area,Oh and i never put it up for debate or to need to justify myself,looked for help only,because i am not in the habit of advertising my problems on the net whatsoever and its hard to ask for help,think i'd rather pay the money now than ever ask for any help on any internet again
                              Last edited by M4D YN; 23 March 2014, 09:29.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Debt arrangement and attachment (scotland) act 2002,intimation of proposed attachment

                                Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                                1. I note that you have cast some doubt on the efficiency of the council, but have you made a formal complaint?
                                2. If you have made a complaint, what was the result and how high up the council's paid staff did it go?
                                3. Have you complained to the CEO of West Dunbartonshire Council, Ms Joyce White? (email - joyce.white@west-dunbarton.gov.uk)
                                4. If you exhausted all the possible means to complain, did you then take the matter to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsperson? (link)
                                5. Have you moaned about this to your elected councillors, MP and/or MSP? Find the snollygosters at http://www.writetothem.com
                                Originally posted by M4D YN View Post
                                I have done none of the above,this is my first problem like this and ain't no good at letters/emails ect,i am a go up to the counter or phone and shout and ball at them type character,which will cause more hassle than its worth mostly
                                M4DYN the way I see it the only way to avoid next Wednesday's visit is to take Cloggy's advice and make a formal complaint. The Council will probably have the authority to cancel the visit while the matter is fully investigated. You will need to give them a reason to investigate. If you firmly believe that your lease had ended or been cancelled then tell them that and back it up with paperwork. If you don't have the paperwork then they won't believe you but they may investigate anyway.

                                It's my understanding that you still have the option to make an arrangement to pay this to the Sheriff's Office by instalments if you prefer not to pay the lump sum. If you enter into that agreement on Monday/Tuesday then they will have no reason to send the Sheriff's Officers to your home on Wednesday. You can then tackle the ex-Landlord afterwards by sending him a Letter Before Action (aka pre-sue letter in Scotland) which sets out your claim (you want to recover the £503.91 which you say he owes the council not you) and give him a date by which he must refund you or you will issue legal proceedings.

                                Here is how to sue your ex-Landlord and it's cheaper than you think: http://scotland.shelter.org.uk/get_a...ction_to_court

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X