GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pompeyfaith
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    A Nation that does not want to work and that has plenty of jobs

    A portrait of desperate Britain: 4,000 job seekers queue for chance of employment at new shopping centre | Mail Online

    And this is the tory Daily Mail

    Leave a comment:


  • SA Gold
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Not Bank of Cyprus -
    naturally :niddy

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by missy View Post
    Sounds like a plan Any offshore account in particular?
    Not Bank of Cyprus -

    Leave a comment:


  • SA Gold
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    not to pay into a pension, save cash in an offshore account and sign house over to kids so when I retire I am "worthless". That way I will milk the system for the last 5 working years of my life then go abroad and spend my savings etc.

    Why not? A lot of us take that attitude now, forced into it.
    Sounds like a plan Any offshore account in particular?

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post
    Yes he is right the areas still exist, St Pauls I know about.
    I used to live near it - literally opposite and up a bit and it was one of the roughest area's ever seen (by my eyes) yet here I am from a place just outside The Raploch in Stirling which I thought was like worse than Beirut but nope, St Pauls blew me away. Whores pimping it out at 8am, drugs on tap and if you ever took a wrong turn and ended up in a 'Negro-Bar' then you rarely walked away unscathed....

    I call it a Negro Bar as the main one was nicknamed, Negro's Only. No, really, it was!

    As for Harehills in Leeds, Seacroft in Leeds, East End park etc - utter slums. Make Beirut look like Westminster.

    Point is, in these area's there are loads of generation claimants - loads

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Nah, that glossary is not factual mate - the new statesman and facts belong together like elvis shagging a fish on the moon and the sunday sport

    This for example
    Utter bollocks

    Try visiting some depraved areas, Seacroft, harehills, dewsbury road etc in leeds. St Pauls etc in Bristol - they exist all over. Generations of unemployment is factual - hell I know a dozen families myself,....


    Yes he is right the areas still exist, St Pauls I know about.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Filipino nurses were brought into the UK on a government approved scheme from 2000 mate - I was involved in part of it for the Burmantofts area of Leeds (in partnership with St James' Training). That's totally different, and Filipino's were not who I referred to


    I know that was not personal just a statement,the nurses I know about as I was also involved in an organisation since 1990 who was formed to asiist and help persons in our situation with the Immigration side of U.K. citizens and the "Primary Purpose Rule", certain Indian people (not a lot) but some even came along to certain meetings as they were having same problems (they also mentioned Pakistanies ruining the system), and the area you touched on were also mentioned by them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by cardiac arrest View Post
    The myth of the


    here's some facts....if anyone is interested in facts...
    Nah, that glossary is not factual mate - the new statesman and facts belong together like elvis shagging a fish on the moon and the sunday sport

    This for example
    In the real world, it’s pretty hard to find families that have never worked, let alone generations of people on the dole.
    Utter bollocks

    Try visiting some depraved areas, Seacroft, harehills, dewsbury road etc in leeds. St Pauls etc in Bristol - they exist all over. Generations of unemployment is factual - hell I know a dozen families myself,....

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by missy View Post
    Interesting thread. I have to say i agree with Niddy on this, totally. The whole benefits system needs reviewing urgently. People of my age are going to be carried out of work - won't be able to afford to retire!
    That's another thing, I am working my bollocks off for what? Apparently we won't get a pension when we retire (us in our late 30's/early 40's) so hows that fair when I pay tax for yonks to support the slags and scroats of the millenium yet in return I am going to get sod all back? Nah, not on my watch so I already decided not to pay into a pension, save cash in an offshore account and sign house over to kids so when I retire I am "worthless". That way I will milk the system for the last 5 working years of my life then go abroad and spend my savings etc.

    Why not? A lot of us take that attitude now, forced into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • cardiac arrest
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    The myth of the


    here's some facts....if anyone is interested in facts...

    Leave a comment:


  • SA Gold
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Interesting thread. I have to say i agree with Niddy on this, totally. The whole benefits system needs reviewing urgently. People of my age are going to be carried out of work - won't be able to afford to retire!

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post
    Sorry (Her Kind) = philipina working in health services, my O.H. works with special needs on night duty,alot of her friend work in hospitals/care homes and aslo seem to do the hours others do not want, my O.H. use to work in ther middle east for an arab family and had problems with certain family members and immigration case to join me here with our daughter couple of decades ago, hence BBC1 T/V. appearances and Women Magazine article, those of similair cases, I also had solicitors contact and asking for comparison to cases they had also certain offices within the U.N. made contact as they were dealing with Indian and certain otherAsian peoples treatment.
    Filipino nurses were brought into the UK on a government approved scheme from 2000 mate - I was involved in part of it for the Burmantofts area of Leeds (in partnership with St James' Training). That's totally different, and Filipino's were not who I referred to

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Her kind? What does that mean mate?

    Typically Pakistani's are renowned for benefit fraud, when I was involved in fraud back in 2002 they accounted for 87% of all fraud. 87 feckin percent. Disgusting.

    The problem was the women would come in and claim, yet their fella would refuse to discuss the income so they'd be working and claiming, then they'd say they had the obligatory 27 kids - funny that how Pakistan woman claimants always have loads of kids.... Don't get me started on those wearing Burka's - one woman had 122 claims at once using varying names. I pushed for a custodial on her - bitch.


    like after leaving the army I had to go to social security to sign certain papers as I had a daughter on the way and possibly adopting 3 others (partner then own children) and 4 women from downour street were ahead of me and the case of the bright green shoes came about, woman 1 goes up to the screen shows worn out bright green shoes get paperwork goes and collects money from another window, women 2 goes up with a bright pair of shoes same thing happensd, women 3 then 4 goes up with bright green shoes and claim, I go up and sign papers and am told that no claim to-wards the family as I had been discharges with 2 weeks money ( not arrived), those women were in the pub that night playing darts and the O.H. (then ) stated they do that every week for night out money only different items.

    Leave a comment:


  • helmsman
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Its not the Poles mate, it's primarily the Asian communities that claim this weird benefit. Pakistani is the worst followed by Sheikh.

    Indians tend to work as do the Chinese.

    Is that racist cos I am declaring facts? If so tough! It's nowt to do with the colour of skin, but what they're doing
    The Polish claim that amount each year thats a fact I heard on the news, I dont doubt others are claiming more, that was the one I was sure about.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Government lose Bedroom Tax challenge decision

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Her kind? What does that mean mate?

    Typically Pakistani's are renowned for benefit fraud, when I was involved in fraud back in 2002 they accounted for 87% of all fraud. 87 feckin percent. Disgusting.

    The problem was the women would come in and claim, yet their fella would refuse to discuss the income so they'd be working and claiming, then they'd say they had the obligatory 27 kids - funny that how Pakistan woman claimants always have loads of kids.... Don't get me started on those wearing Burka's - one woman had 122 claims at once using varying names. I pushed for a custodial on her - bitch.
    Sorry (Her Kind) = philipina working in health services, my O.H. works with special needs on night duty,alot of her friend work in hospitals/care homes and aslo seem to do the hours others do not want, my O.H. use to work in the Middle East for an Arab family and had problems with certain family members and immigration case to join me here with our daughter couple of decades ago, hence BBC1 T/V. appearances and Women Magazine article, those of similair cases, I also had solicitors contact and asking for comparison to cases they had also certain offices within the U.N. made contact as they were dealing with Indian and certain otherAsian peoples treatment.
    Last edited by The Tech Clerk; 29 March 2013, 09:12.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X