Threshold introduced for charging orders

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Hey Pooky,
Whats is the history between CAG and Niddy?
adinuff

I hate them, their owner, their advice, their name, their being, everything

[pompeyfaith]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Niddy can you send a group email to all members as that may entice them to come here and sign?

[The Tech Clerk]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

oopppsss out of this thread for now!

[PlanB]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Hey Pooky,
Whats is the history between CAG and Niddy?
adinuff

[Adinuff]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.

It will most lekely get deleted anyways if it is posted...

Hey Pooky,
Whats is the history between CAG and Niddy?
adinuff

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Stephen Smith

At least I managed to get the allaboutFORUMS.co.uk in there

[pooky2483]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Just checked the epetition, its got 50 so far.
Change Charging Order Bankruptcy Thresholds - e-petitions

[pooky2483]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

LB only have 2147 active members....

...And a lot of them are from here lol

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

It's already on Legal Beagles so that 74,000 more possible signatures

http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...753#post331753

LB only have 2147 active members....

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.

That's cos they are pretty crap though. They have less than 10,000 active users, the 34,000 or whatever they claim was long before bank reclaims and the OFT test case went tits up.

After that, they have hardly any posters. Not surprising really.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

I have edited the last 10 or so posts as you're mis-quoting. Please quote the full post or just reply.

Thanks

[pooky2483]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.

It will most lekely get deleted anyways if it is posted...

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Post it wherever guys - i'm happy so long as it gets noticed and signed.

It's also appearing in most our mods signatures.

[PlanB]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

I'm agreeing with you - the more the merrier

It's a petition not a competition.

[michael]

Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

Not sure where you've come up with that multiple, but on that basis your forgoing 100m on MSE and 34m on CAG, which is pretty much twice the entire UK population.