GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Roger UE Diary - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roger UE Diary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roger
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Dont do anything. Chat with Jo and do what she suggests. Pointless doing stuff that might be irrelevant so chat with Jo THEN do as she suggests. She's the lawyer

    Your argument is moving away from the start date of 1976 and towards the unlawful inception of the midland bank CREDIT CARDS in the 90's. Hence the CCA should apply as should your consumer rights. See what the expert says.
    And they can't issue section 9! The 1976 date is the red herring. Can prove the 90's because the BIN card Number!! Which I actually spoke off at the Trial. This Card dates from 90's because HSBC BIN number didn't exist before!

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Sorry!! But I have never discussed this with anybody.
    Just forget 1977 and the whole 70's for that matter. ive said, tell Jo tmw when she calls you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    1977 is irrelevant - it's May 1985.

    Arghhhhhh

    Anyway do nothing until Jo suggests best advice
    Sorry!! But I have never discussed this with anybody.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    She! Yes Plan B! Let me put this lot together scan it and send it over.
    HSBC on the very Day of the Case were producing last minute paper works including a further late Witness Statement. Costs escalated and were advised day before! The Original Witness wasn't present to be questioned over their statement.
    I was blamed by Counsel for refusing to agree a change of Claim dropping CCA 1974!
    Dont do anything. Chat with Jo and do what she suggests. Pointless doing stuff that might be irrelevant so chat with Jo THEN do as she suggests. She's the lawyer

    Your argument is moving away from the start date of 1976 and towards the unlawful inception of the midland bank CREDIT CARDS in the 90's. Hence the CCA should apply as should your consumer rights. See what the expert says.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by PlanB View Post
    If you raised it orally at the hearing then get a transcript.

    It was the DJ's job to read the WS (evidence before the court) not your job to make him read it.

    He had to consider all the facts in front of him.

    Plan B x
    She! Yes Plan B! Let me put this lot together scan it and send it over.
    HSBC on the very Day of the Case were producing last minute paper works including a further late Witness Statement. Costs escalated and were advised day before! The Original Witness wasn't present to be questioned over their statement.
    I was blamed by Counsel for refusing to agree a change of Claim dropping CCA 1974!

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Thank you its seem strange putting the HSBC CC in the Diary BUT this was part of the original plan agreed with ALL my Unsecured Creditors. Hence putting the saga in the Diary and telling the story. If nothing else it helps others especially with these pre 1977 Cards (and they and their predecessors are still around!)
    1977 is irrelevant - it's May 1985.

    Arghhhhhh

    Anyway do nothing until Jo suggests best advice

    Leave a comment:


  • PlanB
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    I told the Judge! That HSBC had simply sent me their Card . . . .

    I was honest with the Judge! But failed to point something in their witness statement that the had looked for the Agreement but the signed agreement wasn't necessary .
    If you raised it orally at the hearing then get a transcript.

    It was the DJ's job to read the Claimant's WS (evidence before the court) not your job to make him read it.

    He had to consider all the facts in front of him.

    Plan B x

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Thank you its seem strange putting the HSBC CC in the Diary BUT this was part of the original plan agreed with ALL my Unsecured Creditors. Hence putting the saga in the Diary and telling the story. If nothing else it helps others especially with these pre 1977 Cards (and they and their predecessors are still around!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    I've just made Jo aware so remind her tmw when you chat.
    Thank you If nothing else at least she will know!

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by PlanB View Post
    Did you raise this legal argument in your Defence?

    If you didn't then I doubt you'll be allowed a second bite of the cherry.

    A DJ can only be expected to consider the facts put before him at the time (Claim(POC)/Defence/WSs/oral evidence at the hearing).

    Send your Defence to Niddy and we'll see where this leads.

    Plan B x
    I told the Judge! That HSBC had simply sent me their Card (I actually have a early statement that's shows a really low limit - see the Access limit was originally £100 and this remained for the duration) when the switched the Cards that limited began to climb! I will email info over and let you sniff around
    I was honest with the Judge! But failed to point something in their witness statement that the had looked for the Agreement but the signed agreement wasn't necessary (words to that effect).
    The judge told me I should have gone to a solicitor!!
    I didn't issue a witness statement just my defence and counterclaim with evidential docs.
    The Judge really gave them a Hollow victory because their Costs were unpaid and more or less equal to the debt + interest.
    Last edited by Roger; 4 December 2015, 23:20.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    I've just made Jo aware so remind her tmw when you chat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    That allows for an application (appeal) that's out of time
    Well I can send by Defence and Counterclaim over. The Counterclaim was naff but my defence I don't think was. The Court didn't like it so I had to rewrite the Defence.
    The original Defence was

    The defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of each and every fact pleaded in their particulars of claim.
    The claimant response to defendant’s request for copies of this alleged agreement . a) 16th December 2013 (“the credit card was opened in 1976 and as our client is not required to keep documents that are older that 6 years, they no longer hold a copy”)
    b) 7th January 2014 (“We understand that until we do this we may be unable to take action in the courts”)
    The first reference to a 1976 date was (a) above.
    The Consumer Credit Act 1974 came into force on 31st July 1974.
    However different sections of the Act were phased in over a number of years & under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Commencement No.2) Order 1977, credit agreements made before 1st April 1977 were not regulated agreements under the Act.
    The claimants alleged agreement dated 1st August 1976 does not come under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
    The defendant recalls signing no such document.
    I was forced by the court to change this or loose by default!
    I will dig out the more lengthly amended Defence

    Leave a comment:


  • PlanB
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    They simply sent out HSBC card with updated Credit Limit!! The Personal Loan was because I cleared this right down (big chunk of money) off my head (but I can check the dates 2005/7?
    Did you raise this legal argument in your Defence?

    If you didn't then I doubt you'll be allowed a second bite of the cherry.

    A DJ can only be expected to consider the facts put before him at the time (Claim(POC)/Defence/WSs/oral evidence at the hearing).

    Send your Defence to Niddy and we'll see where this leads.

    Plan B x

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Exactly what happened! They simply sent out HSBC card with updated Credit Limit!! The Personal Loan was because I cleared this right down (big chunk of money) off my head (but I can check the dates 2005/7?
    Mention this case when you chat to Jo - just remind her it's separate and say Niddy suggested you mention it and ask about the CCJ itself (it shouldn't be valid if settled within 28 days) and also about the access card to midland bank visa/master card "upgrade" when you never asked for a midland bank CREDIT CARD.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Which is correct process, as per the regulations (Copy Docs Reg.9) - however the problem occurs with how the cards were incepted. If they just sent you the new credit cards then that changed everything as the relevant sections of CCA were enacted in the late 90's (ie s.60/61/78/87/88 etc etc)....

    Likewise, it began as Access (restricted) and went to Visa & MasterCard which was widely accepted (Access wasn't and you couldn't withdraw cash either (from ATM)).
    Exactly what happened! They simply sent out HSBC card with updated Credit Limit!! The Personal Loan was because I cleared this right down (big chunk of money) off my head (but I can check the dates 2005/7?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X