Originally posted by trueblue
View Post
Did Cabot's letter also say that the debt was currently unenforceable?
According to the FCA Handbook CONC 13.1.6 (8) they should tell you that, otherwise it's viewed as misleading >
(8) However, where a firm is aware that an agreement is unenforceable because of non-compliance with an information request under section 77, 78 or 79 of the CCA, a firm should make it clear when communicating to a customer about a debt that the debt is in fact unenforceable. Failure to do so, in that case, would in the FCA's view unfairly mislead the customer by omission. Any communication that implies expressly or otherwise that a debt is enforceable when it is known that it is not, would be misleading. One way to avoid this would be for the firm to explain to the customer the full meaning of 'unenforceable'.
Di
Comment