Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A word of warning
Collapse
X
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by FlowerpowerBoth judgments work in favour of the banks in most cases.
Parts of Carey can be useful but it would take someone with Paul's or Niddy's skills to pick those bits and turn them to the consumer's advantage. In the meantime a lot of debtors are being fobed off with Carey - making them believe UE is dead and you just have to roll over and pay! and that's just the web forums allegedly set up to help the consumer!
Has any prosecution been attempted for forgery and, if not, why not?
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by CleverClogs View PostAnd what of those cases where a creditor can be shewn to have "been creative" in their "reconstruction" of the alleged agreement, such as a purported reconstituted agreement bearing the signature of someone other than the alleged debtor?
Has any prosecution been attempted for forgery and, if not, why not?
I agree though, how the hell they get away with some of the stunts they pull I'll never know...........-----------------------------------------------
Happiness, is screwing over a DCA.......
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by thechippy View PostI agree though, how the hell they get away with some of the stunts they pull I'll never know...........I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!
If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by baxta59 View PostThis is quite a depressing post really
Ok well then it must be equally depressing to learn that i relied on Carey in HFO v Wegmuller, Cabot v Bachellier, Phoenix v Kotecha, Harrison v Link Financial Limited, Phoenix v Cresswell the list goes on and on and on
It is only as depressing as we want to make it.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by baxta59 View PostThis is quite a depressing post really
You make a decision based on the risks and costs, and decide what is sensible based on the evidence to hand and the costs of doing so.
What you have to remember is that the creditors will be doing exactly the same thing.
One of the things to consider with UE is that there may be a possibility your creditors will take court action, and at that point you make a decision to stand your ground or come to an agreement.
Now the odds of a creditor challenging a UE agreement and taking things so far are something else (i.e. so far they are tiny), but that is a risk that each one of us using UE accepts when we start on that journey.
Best
SnV"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve."
The consumer is that sleeping giant.!!
I'm an official AAD Moderator and also a volunteer, here to help make the forum run smoothly. Any views or opinions are mine and not the official line of AAD. Similarly, any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional - Find a Solicitor or go to the National Probono Centre.
If you spot an abusive or libellous post then please report it by Clicking Here. If you need to contact me, for instance if I've issued you a warning, moved, edited or deleted your post, please send me a message by clicking my username.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
well said SnV
If anyone is pursuing UE they must be aware of the risks and downsides as well as the upsides.
It's definitely a marathon not a sprint and it feels very good to be somewhat in charge of the procedure.
Basically what else are you going to do? Pay? Starve? Lose your house?
There are no debt avoiders here, frankly they don't last, they realise it can be hard and they do something else.
You will all note that every newbie is asked to read the diaries and the info threads, no one should approach this without knowing a fair bit about it, if you think, that's how most of us got into debt in the first place, not reading and learning all the consequences of our actions. and there is a endless stream of help avaialble to get us through and we learn more as we grow.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
I agree Flowerpower that there is a risk in anything and I say use UE if it fits and I'm not say that I wouldn't do it again if I had to.
All I wanted to do was to bring a little balance and for people to remember UE isn't the best course of action in every case.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Negativity is depressing to me not the process. Any court ruling which finds in favour a creditor who has blatantly forged documents is wholly unsettling. In fact anything that lessens the chances of a win for a debtor is a victory for all creditors as it can be used against further claims. Setting a precidense. Does not lessen the fight if a fight is chosen but it does lessen the chances of a win for the debtor surely? The percentages start to shift however small in their favour.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by FlowerpowerThere is a risk associated with anything in life: merely getting out of bed can get you in trouble and cooking can lead to injury.
Air travel is meant to be very safe but on the odd occasion planes do crash, yet we are all happy to board a plane to go on holiday, do business or visit family and friends because the odds of something going wrong are very small. If we wanted to be 100% safe all the time we'd just stay in bed!
There's a small risk associated with UE but it's well worth it! All you have to do is compare the diaries here with the ones OTR where people are paying every penny into a DMP to be debt free by… 2024! Whoooha! And even then there's no guarantee you won't end up in court! Let's not forget there's also a small risk of ending up in court when you are on a DMP because they are not legally binding - they can take you to court years after you defaulted and you'd end up with a fresh CCJ that will stay in place another 6 years. Given the two choices above I know which one I prefer!
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by Flowerpowerand cooking can lead to injury."I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve."
The consumer is that sleeping giant.!!
I'm an official AAD Moderator and also a volunteer, here to help make the forum run smoothly. Any views or opinions are mine and not the official line of AAD. Similarly, any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional - Find a Solicitor or go to the National Probono Centre.
If you spot an abusive or libellous post then please report it by Clicking Here. If you need to contact me, for instance if I've issued you a warning, moved, edited or deleted your post, please send me a message by clicking my username.
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by FlowerpowerThere is a risk associated with anything in life: merely getting out of bed can get you in trouble and cooking can lead to injury.
Air travel is meant to be very safe but on the odd occasion planes do crash, yet we are all happy to board a plane to go on holiday, do business or visit family and friends because the odds of something going wrong are very small. If we wanted to be 100% safe all the time we'd just stay in bed!
There's a small risk associated with UE but it's well worth it! All you have to do is compare the diaries here with the ones OTR where people are paying every penny into a DMP to be debt free by… 2024! Whoooha! And even then there's no guarantee you won't end up in court! Let's not forget there's also a small risk of ending up in court when you are on a DMP because they are not legally binding - they can take you to court years after you defaulted and you'd end up with a fresh CCJ that will stay in place another 6 years. Given the two choices above I know which one I prefer!
Comment
-
Re: A word of warning
Originally posted by helmsman View PostSpot on I paid cccs for 3 years £30000, debts were still the same some creditors stopped charges after a year some did not, I joined in 2010 I have 2 ccjs both managable lots ue some not, it has been the best thing we have done we have a life now thanks to this site, ok we wont get credit again and we dont want it, obviously others younger wanting a mortgage ect thats a big problem.
Comment
Comment