Illegible agreement

[PriorityOne]

Re: elligable agreement

I know, nothing changes - my opinion stands - they can still provide a recon

You're arguing s.127 which I am not even that far yet, cos the basic principle is they can provide a recon within s.77-79 requests then from that you define the flaws within s.60(1); s.65(1) & s.61 etc to reach the conclusion they cannot enforce within s.127.

Make sense...?

Have a mooch here ---> allaboutFORUMS - View Single Post - UPDATED - A Full Guide to Unenforceability

Ok.... I see. They can (and do sometimes try) to provide a recon. in response to a sec 77/78 request and it can then be picked apart from that point on; hopefully pre-court.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: elligable agreement

Ok.... I see. They can (and do sometimes try) to provide a recon. in response to a sec 77/78 request and it can then be picked apart from that point on; hopefully pre-court.

Exactly, s.127 is what we use to STOP enforcement, however it's the provisions as noted above that we find fault with in order to get to s.127.

Make sense... haha (it's confusing thus we try and stick to the simple forumla of check terms, find fault then decide) - only in exceptional cases (not like this) would we need to delve into the ramifications of original or copy document.

[SXGuy]

Re: Illegible agreement

Thanks Niddy! Didnt mean to jump the queue lol i do apreciate it though!

Well.. thats nearly 30k of credit thats now UE, 11k being blagged.

Id say thats a victory