Re: Help with Cabot please
Hi DebtMagnet,
Having read through your thread, I honestly think you need to simplify the situation and tackle the problems you have in a logical and structured order.
You need to make a mental shift, from a state of confusion and trying to do too many things at once, to concentrating on achieving your objectives in a coherent order. Forget about credit files and defaults. Put them 90% out of your mind. This file is going to be completely screwed for years to come, and you need to put yourself in the frame of mind where that is accepted as a necessary consequence of having to handle a debt situation.
Here is what I would do if I was in your position -
1) Start a UE diary thread in the appropriate forum. List all of your alleged debts in the form which makes it easy for people to see at a glance what is happening with each separate issue.
2) Send CCA requests (s. 77 for fixed loans, s. 78 for running accounts, and our special request for overdrafts) for all existing alleged debts. I would even send them for any post-April 2007 debts, because these can often be 'blagged' if they end up with useless DCAs.
3) Get away from PayPlan as quickly as you can. They are wolves in sheep's clothing, funded by the very industry you are having to fight against, and they can be extremely dangerous. They have been known to return court forms as admissions without even informing the alleged debtor, and if you look on their website, you will find that they tell you to file an admission and make arrangements to pay in all cases where a court form is received. There is no mention of the possibility of filing a defence. Is that the type of organisation you want running your financial affairs?
The issue of defaults does and does not matter at the same time, if that doesn't sound too contradictory. Your credit file is going to be screwed for years, so the whole issue is an extremely minor one and should basically be ignored when following unenforceability. However, you want to try to get the defaults registered as quickly as possible, so that they come off earlier when you do get to try to rebuild your credit file. It is very much a minor issue when compared with seeing five figure alleged debts going statute barred, though.
You say that you have equity in a property? In that case, your best defence at this stage is a formal request for information under sections 77-79 of the CCA 1974. Without this in place, you are like a sitting target for anyone who wants to take a court pot shot at you. Frankly, given that you are dealing with Crapbot Farcical, are a home owner, and have an alleged debt in five figures, I'm surprised it hasn't happened already. If this is an old Sharklaycard from around 2001/2, then it would be extremely unlikely that the agreement even exists, so a request under s. 78 is likely to prove to be a permanent defence.
The first thing I would do is read some of the UE diary threads to get an idea of how the process works. We can tackle the default issue, but it is extremely minor in the overall context of your situation. What you are doing now is akin to worrying about an ingrown toenail when you've been diagnosed with cancer.
SH
Hi DebtMagnet,
Having read through your thread, I honestly think you need to simplify the situation and tackle the problems you have in a logical and structured order.
You need to make a mental shift, from a state of confusion and trying to do too many things at once, to concentrating on achieving your objectives in a coherent order. Forget about credit files and defaults. Put them 90% out of your mind. This file is going to be completely screwed for years to come, and you need to put yourself in the frame of mind where that is accepted as a necessary consequence of having to handle a debt situation.
Here is what I would do if I was in your position -
1) Start a UE diary thread in the appropriate forum. List all of your alleged debts in the form which makes it easy for people to see at a glance what is happening with each separate issue.
2) Send CCA requests (s. 77 for fixed loans, s. 78 for running accounts, and our special request for overdrafts) for all existing alleged debts. I would even send them for any post-April 2007 debts, because these can often be 'blagged' if they end up with useless DCAs.
3) Get away from PayPlan as quickly as you can. They are wolves in sheep's clothing, funded by the very industry you are having to fight against, and they can be extremely dangerous. They have been known to return court forms as admissions without even informing the alleged debtor, and if you look on their website, you will find that they tell you to file an admission and make arrangements to pay in all cases where a court form is received. There is no mention of the possibility of filing a defence. Is that the type of organisation you want running your financial affairs?
The issue of defaults does and does not matter at the same time, if that doesn't sound too contradictory. Your credit file is going to be screwed for years, so the whole issue is an extremely minor one and should basically be ignored when following unenforceability. However, you want to try to get the defaults registered as quickly as possible, so that they come off earlier when you do get to try to rebuild your credit file. It is very much a minor issue when compared with seeing five figure alleged debts going statute barred, though.
You say that you have equity in a property? In that case, your best defence at this stage is a formal request for information under sections 77-79 of the CCA 1974. Without this in place, you are like a sitting target for anyone who wants to take a court pot shot at you. Frankly, given that you are dealing with Crapbot Farcical, are a home owner, and have an alleged debt in five figures, I'm surprised it hasn't happened already. If this is an old Sharklaycard from around 2001/2, then it would be extremely unlikely that the agreement even exists, so a request under s. 78 is likely to prove to be a permanent defence.
The first thing I would do is read some of the UE diary threads to get an idea of how the process works. We can tackle the default issue, but it is extremely minor in the overall context of your situation. What you are doing now is akin to worrying about an ingrown toenail when you've been diagnosed with cancer.
SH
Comment