GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Determining if DFN issued, the date, and importance further to sending for CCA's to creditors - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Determining if DFN issued, the date, and importance further to sending for CCA's to creditors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nightwatch
    replied
    at the top of the screen is the web address bar, highlight the address by right clicking on your mouse, a dropdown index should appear, click copy, then paste in to your message to Niddy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Florida2020
    replied
    Many thanks I'll follow up on your advice and will send to the webmaster, how do i send a link to this thread please?

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    You will not receive any copy of a Default that was issued as it is not part of the CCA request,

    you will need a SAR for that, even then you may not see a copy of the default, only a reference to it in the notes somewhere.

    the letter received is telling you that they feel they have complied with your request, which they have, the quote from Carey v HSBC is now old hat, i don't know why they still use it.

    HH judge Wakesman did indeed say a recon is compliant for S78, as it is for information only, However, if it was to go to court, they Need the original agreement, along with the T&C at the time of opening the agreement.

    Send what you have received to Niddy, webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk, send unredacted only he will see it, with a link to this thread'


    When was this account started?

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Florida2020 View Post
    Dear all,
    Thank you again for your ongoing support. Can anyone reading this post please advise relating to the response that I have now had from Capital One.

    Their letter states
    "We enclose a reconstituted copy of your original agreement. Although not required under S78 we have included as part of the reconstituted agreement a scanned copy of the signed signature page of your original agreement. The reconstituted agreement sets out the terms of your agreement and your name and address when you entered into your agreement with Capital One on 2 July 2001. We also enclose a copy of your defaulted agreement; and a statement of account required under S78 which is set out at the end. By providing the information set out above we have complied with our obligation under S78 to provide you with a copy of your executed agreement. It was confirmed by the judgement of His Honour Judge Waksman QC in Carey v HSBC [2009] 3417 (QB) that providing a reconstituted copy of your agreement is compliant with S78 and there is no requirement under the CCA to provide you with a copy of the original signed agreement"

    So there we go, a very long-winded response, also in their enclosures I cannot see any form of document that looks like a default notice. Can anyone please advise what the position is relating to this letter i have now had from Capital One?
    My advice is DON'T try to be your own Judge of Capital One's response!
    Don't reply or otherwise engage with Capitol One (you are a long way from a CCJ).

    CCA 1974 this Act has grown with additions etc.. since that year! Plus a consider amount of legal precedent. Its NOT static so make notes (for your own purposes) but take advantage of this AAD site because there is a wealth of knowledge here!
    Don't over think. Your next step is to send a unredacted copy of this paper work to Niddy (webmaster - NOBODY ELSE WILL SEE THIS) for review.

    "..When or if you receive CCA's send unredacted copy to:- webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk for checking refer to this thread .."

    Leave a comment:


  • Florida2020
    replied
    Dear all,
    Thank you again for your ongoing support. Can anyone reading this post please advise relating to the response that I have now had from Capital One.

    Their letter states
    "We enclose a reconstituted copy of your original agreement. Although not required under S78 we have included as part of the reconstituted agreement a scanned copy of the signed signature page of your original agreement. The reconstituted agreement sets out the terms of your agreement and your name and address when you entered into your agreement with Capital One on 2 July 2001. We also enclose a copy of your defaulted agreement; and a statement of account required under S78 which is set out at the end. By providing the information set out above we have complied with our obligation under S78 to provide you with a copy of your executed agreement. It was confirmed by the judgement of His Honour Judge Waksman QC in Carey v HSBC [2009] 3417 (QB) that providing a reconstituted copy of your agreement is compliant with S78 and there is no requirement under the CCA to provide you with a copy of the original signed agreement"

    So there we go, a very long-winded response, also in their enclosures I cannot see any form of document that looks like a default notice. Can anyone please advise what the position is relating to this letter i have now had from Capital One?

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    Originally posted by Diana Mayhew View Post


    I tend to have that effect on people

    Di

    Leave a comment:


  • Joanna Connolly Solicitors
    replied
    Originally posted by Florida2020 View Post
    I approached all creditors by telephone a week or so before finding out about this forum and made offers in full and final [circa 30-50%] before stumbling across this forum and having a chance to speak with the lovely Diana on the telephone. It was only then that I realized that I need to go down the request CCA route and contest things.

    I tend to have that effect on people

    Di

    Leave a comment:


  • Colin G Quinn
    replied
    Hi all,

    With regards to an interpretation as to what is meant by the comment made by Robinson Way, I can probably shed some light on that;

    Debt purchasers do not warehouse account documentation and the amount of people who do not choose to dispute an account, assignment or Claim, versus the small amount who do, means original creditors and assignees/debt purchasers do not exchange account documents at the point of assignment for 'economical' purposes. At least economical purposes from their point of view.

    Purchasing parties are usually obliged to report the status of accounts to the original creditors, say on a monthly or quarterly basis for instance. That way the original creditor can monitor which accounts they have sold are performing. It also allows them to understand if any accounts they have assigned are in dispute and, if so, if there is any risk to reputation for them.

    Furthermore, many original creditors won't release documents to even the party who has purchased the account, unless the account is in dispute and there is a valid reason for doing so from their point of view, i.e. a defence or application to set aside a Judgment received by the assignee.

    I imagine that because you are/were paying StepChange, you account was being reported as a 'performing' account and for that reason the assignee won't be able to request documents from the original creditor upon receipt of your CCA request, or that any such request for documents would likely be ignored or at the very least treated as non-urgent. Which it is of course to the assignee who has 12 working days to comply with the request before falling into breach of Section 77/78 of the CCA.

    I therefore also imagine that the only option for the assignee, at least from their point of view, is to cancel the StepChange arrangement, at which point your account becomes 'non-performing' and in dispute owing to the CCA request.

    The issue of the assignee or a party instructed on their behalf deliberately disabling your ability to make payments raises quite a number of issues however.

    In any event, the request has been acknowledged.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Florida2020 View Post
    Thanks guys,
    I really appreciate your support and very much valued advice. Things have gone quiet with Cabot and Wescot also acknowledging receipt and advising they are dealing with my request. The only surprising and rather disturbing thing is that Robinson Way [Hoist] have now acknowledged my request, however, they have advised that "In order for us to request the document from our client, we have had to cancel the StepChange arrangement that was in place" None of the other companies that I have written to have said this, and I am now concerned at what will happen in the event of default. As far as i am concerned the arrangement is still in place.

    At this stage, would i be advised to approach stepchange to discuss in view of the response from Robinson way?
    Also, I agree with Night watches advice to have a look for any DDN's and/or correspondence. Correspondence isn't scattered everywhen but in boxes on the attice so i'll take a look and compile a fie.

    Looking forward to any advice and will keep you all updated on here.
    Many thanks!
    ??
    How can a S.77/78 CCA Request (plus £1) cancel the StepChange arrangement?
    Ignore and file. They have acknowledged receipt!

    Leave a comment:


  • Florida2020
    replied
    Thanks guys,
    I really appreciate your support and very much valued advice. Things have gone quiet with Cabot and Wescot also acknowledging receipt and advising they are dealing with my request. The only surprising and rather disturbing thing is that Robinson Way [Hoist] have now acknowledged my request, however, they have advised that "In order for us to request the document from our client, we have had to cancel the StepChange arrangement that was in place" None of the other companies that I have written to have said this, and I am now concerned at what will happen in the event of default. As far as i am concerned the arrangement is still in place.

    At this stage, would i be advised to approach stepchange to discuss in view of the response from Robinson way?
    Also, I agree with Night watches advice to have a look for any DDN's and/or correspondence. Correspondence isn't scattered everywhen but in boxes on the attice so i'll take a look and compile a fie.

    Looking forward to any advice and will keep you all updated on here.
    Many thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    Hi,

    Please keep the letters saying they don't require payment for the CCA request, just update each debt post to say payment returned.

    Go ahead and cash them if you want.

    Please try and find any correspondence and add to you post for each debt, any dates that say when and to whom the debt were sold are an advantage, if you come accross a DFN while up there even better, but I am thinking that they must have been defaulted quite a while ago, put on your Credit reference file and dropped of it now, like ours have. You may find an odd letter saying that a default will be registered with CRA's, so that would give a rough estimate of when it was defaulted.
    this is not a rush job, take your time.

    Having spoken to Di, you will have been told a little about how things work, re F&F and why it is important to see where you stand legaly, before making any offer's.
    they can be like wolves, one sniff of cash and they will be like a pack baying for more,
    but I think as you are still paying them, through your DMP you won't have done much harm.

    let's see what comes back from your request's and take it from there.

    Have a good weekend, NW
    Last edited by nightwatch; 10 July 2020, 10:34. Reason: brain works faster than fingers

    Leave a comment:


  • Warwick65
    replied
    So your attic

    Just at the moment there is little necessity for going all out searching boxes etc BUT
    In the longer term and especially if you think any creditors may be looking at court action then it is important .

    There may be mileage in knowing exactly what they have sent for example if you have a non compliant default notice and they pretend to have sent a different one it could be part of a defence. Of course if you have a good one and they say there isn’t one it would be rather silly to tell anyone and that includes someone who might end up representing you if the debt is large. I suppose fortunately lawyers have codes of conduct and can not lie if you see what I mean.

    So short answer , add the attic search to your todo list but not the urgent one, unless it helps you feel more settled. Me, I would be up there searching but take my advice because I don’t use it?

    And yes Di is fabulous

    Leave a comment:


  • Florida2020
    replied
    Hi all,
    Firstly thank you all ever so much for your advice, guidance, and support. I guess this is something I should have done a long time ago, alas better later than never.

    Ok, in the way of an update, the mystery of returned mail has been resolved. PRA wrote back to me enclosing the PO's advising that as a gesture of goodwill they do not charge the £1 fee. They advise that they will contact me asap, but if I have any problems to telephone them. NCO has also returned PO's stating "Your creditor has advised that they no longer require payment for this therefore we are returning it to you. You will receive the credit agreement in due course".

    Would it be ok if I cash in the postal orders, or should I keep these with copies of the letters? [I think they're valid for 6 months]

    Nightwatch, I'll take your advice and commence a log, probably on a spreadsheet. I think that any DFN's that may have been issued may be in boxes in my attic. It would be a bit of a chore but do any of you think it may be worth the effort to go up and dig around to see if I can locate these? There may also be additional correspondence up there advising when the debts were sold to agents. If so, how important is it that I try to find the DFN's and any additional correspondence?

    It may be worth noting that I approached all creditors by telephone a week or so before finding out about this forum and made offers in full and final [circa 30-50%] before stumbling across this forum and having a chance to speak with the lovely Diana on the telephone. It was only then that I realized that I need to go down the request CCA route and contest things. My monthly payments to the debt management company continue at least for the moment.

    Looking for any updates on your advice in view of my update above whilst I wait for any response on the CCA requests, and will monitor things on this forum.
    Best Regards,
    Florida2020

    Leave a comment:


  • Timewilltell
    replied
    All I can say is you have nothing to loose but everything to gain in giving the details as requested. You have the debt and have been admirably paying it for a long time, it always remains your choice to do what you prefer with this debt. But remember we on here can offer tried and tested advice and although you divulge what is possibly the most personable of information to yourself, at no time will we know who you are or where you are and the debt owners know of your situation anyhow so your embarrassment will be saved. You are clearly curious as to where you stand with the debts as you’ve already moved for CCA requests, so you have nothing to lose by gaining the knowledge and experience of those well versed in the situation you are in as we have all been where you are and some remain on the journey- myself included.

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    Hello and welcome.

    could you tell us which debt management org it is please, i am assuming it is one of the free one's

    I can understand your reluctance in giving some information, but without it, it will be difficult to give specific help, each debt is different, as is the way different debt purchasers work in trying to convince you to fork out your money, sometimes on a debt that may be unenforceable.

    please have a read of my diary to give you an idea of how things work, it is a bit long, 65 pages, but may help you.

    https://all-about-debt.co.uk/forum/d...-diary-of-debt

    enjoy your evening NW

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X