GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Three UK - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three UK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    New letter... Remember they said they wouldn't take an offer??
    yes......

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    50% off now!!


    Originally posted by sam View Post
    Do I re offer my £75 again saying it's my final offer as that's what I was offered by a previous DCA when the debt was at the defaulted balance of £96
    Nope - however see below

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    Or ignore?
    Yep - however see below

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    If we go to court and pay some of it do I still get a CCJ?
    Nope, it'd never get to court! However, say for some freaky reason it did, and they did issue a claim then your options are;
    a) Defend the whole claim and counterclaim costs

    or

    b)
    Make an offer to settle prior to court (direct with the solicitor/dca)

    or

    c) Pay the ccj within 28 days and all trace gets removed as if it never happened
    You need to decide which of the above 3 options best suit you - only you know the answer to this. So, please tell us what is your chosen route then we'll be able to advise on what to do next!

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Have you complained yet as suggested in post #141? link

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    How can one take seriously a company that sends a letter stating that, in the event of getting a CCJ against an alleged debtor, it might "take the money directly from you bank"?

    Don't they have a profo reeder?

    Leave a comment:


  • sam
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    New letter... Remember they said they wouldn't take an offer??
    50% off now!!
    Do I re offer my £75 again saying it's my final offer as that's what I was offered by a previous DCA when the debt was at the defaulted balance of £96

    Or ignore?
    If we go to court and pay some of it do I still get a CCJ?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    OK Niddy will do..
    So they can't CCJ me?

    Oh and "Advisory Team" I like that... Awesome stuff Niddy.

    Thanks again.
    if they try and ccj you we'll then defend it and that's what you want isn';t it? A chance to explain everything and your side of the story? if so then yea, we welcome ccj proceedings as then you get to tell everything to a judge and hope he sees through the bullshit and makes a sensible decision.....

    Personally, I do not think they will go for a ccj - that'd be pure mad for the amount in question, plus you have proof of all your attempts to make settlement dont you? They keep ignoring you and re-selling the debt on, so it's impossible for you to actually resolve.

    Not a good position, thus yea - let them try and ccj you - brilliant if they do

    Leave a comment:


  • sam
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    OK Niddy will do..
    So they can't CCJ me?

    Oh and "Advisory Team" I like that... Awesome stuff Niddy.

    Thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Mate ignore it - they really cannot do anything, you've tried - just move on, forget it.

    I really cannot see much else here other than a complaint about 3's conduct to the regulator. Try that! ---> Ofcom | Charges

    If you still have a problem, just call our Advisory Team on:0300 123 3333 or 020 7981 3040

    Leave a comment:


  • sam
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Ok well take that line out....

    Oh heck, just realised - this aint that bloody mobile phone carry on is it mate? If so do not send it, it's not relevant!
    Yep it's that bloody Three mobile crap!
    I offered £75 like we said but still they pass it to red and now Hamptons!!
    Three Defaulted me on £96 now they and these DCA's state it's £400+
    I've even got an old letter from 2008 from a different DCA offering me to pay the debt of at £73

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    Niddy it says
    "Do you need me to point out that this account is formally in dispute with [ENTER LENDER/DCA NAME] and has been since they failed to acknowledge my Consumer Credit Agreement (CCA) Request, in line with s.78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA1974).|"

    But as this was an over the phone thing I thought they didn't need a CCA or any signatures?
    Ok well take that line out....

    Oh heck, just realised - this aint that bloody mobile phone carry on is it mate? If so do not send it, it's not relevant!

    Leave a comment:


  • sam
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Its all the same firm lol. All they've done is walk across the hallway and ask a colleague to type you a threat from their solicitor to rent letterhead!

    Stop stressing....

    Send this: ---> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - To Commence Litigation
    Niddy it says
    "Do you need me to point out that this account is formally in dispute with [ENTER LENDER/DCA NAME] and has been since they failed to acknowledge my Consumer Credit Agreement (CCA) Request, in line with s.78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA1974).|"

    But as this was an over the phone thing I thought they didn't need a CCA or any signatures?

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by sam View Post
    Thanks for the heads up..
    Up where?

    Leave a comment:


  • sam
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Thanks for the heads up..

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    What 'solicitor-to-rent letterhead'?
    Apologies, ok they "pretend to be official then"

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Hamptons aren't lawyers.
    True - wannabe is more the word

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Hamptons don't even pretend to be lawyers.
    Oh they pretend, but we don't believe

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Hamptons are just some jerks at Lowells who - link - seem never to have heard of rhyming slang.
    Penis - yep, can dig that

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Its all the same firm lol. All they've done is walk across the hallway and ask a colleague to type you a threat from their solicitor to rent letterhead!
    What 'solicitor-to-rent letterhead'?

    Hamptons aren't lawyers.

    Hamptons don't even pretend to be lawyers.

    Hamptons are just some jerks at Lowells who - link - seem never to have heard of rhyming slang.
    Last edited by CleverClogs (RIP); 8 January 2012, 19:25.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Three UK

    Its all the same firm lol. All they've done is walk across the hallway and ask a colleague to type you a threat from their solicitor to rent letterhead!

    Stop stressing....

    Send this: ---> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - To Commence Litigation

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X