Could be a claim soon from Cabot

[PlanB]

UPDATE.

Nothing more received about the above debt. They are still sending the occassional 'request for payment' for the MINT CC which is also in the SAR as being in default of a CCA REEQUEST and is very statute barred.

That's good to hear.

It's nice to start the day reading good news on the forum

Di

[CAPS ESC]

UPDATE.

Nothing more received about the above debt. They are still sending the occassional 'request for payment' for the MINT CC which is also in the SAR as being in default of a CCA REEQUEST and is very statute barred.

[Joanna Connolly Solicitors]

Hi Di and All

The SAR showed that they never contacted me regarding a CCA request that still remains unfulfilled. At some point they realised their error and one of the last entries in my SAR was an internal note ' to look into it'. Little more was heard from them, just some of the usual discount offers. It should be well statute barred now but I am keeping it to myself for now.

Is Cabot still writing to you about this debt?

Di

[CAPS ESC]

Hi Di and All

The SAR showed that they never contacted me regarding a CCA request that still remains unfulfilled. At some point they realised their error and one of the last entries in my SAR was an internal note ' to look into it'. Little more was heard from them, just some of the usual discount offers. It should be well statute barred now but I am keeping it to myself for now.

[Joanna Connolly Solicitors]

Thank you Di,

it looks like they would issue an LBA and with the amount involved there would be added pressure to follow it through from the 'money grabbing' solicitors. So rather than have to send a competent dispute in aweeks time, I have made contact with cabot by sending a SAR to Marlin c/o Cabot. I am hoping that this does not give away any of our aces but does serve as a message to them that they will not get an easy 'judgement by default' and therefore are not tempted to go the claim route

What's been happening with this Marlin debt?

Your last post said you sent a Subject Access Request to Cabot, but I also think the debt was possibly due to go Statute Barred a couple of months ago.

Fingers crossed

Di

[CAPS ESC]

Thank you Di,

I think we agree that especially at this stage it is best to avoid a claim being issued. If I did not respond to them now, it looks like they would issue an LBA and with the amount involved there would be added pressure to follow it through from the 'money grabbing' solicitors. So rather than have to send a competent dispute in aweeks time, I have made contact with cabot by sending a SAR to Marlin c/o Cabot. I am hoping that this does not give away any of our aces but does serve as a message to them that they will not get an easy 'judgement by default' and therefore are not tempted to go the claim route without more thought. Roger (above) seems to have thwarted a claim by sending an SWID at this stage so hopefully it works.
There would be the added bonus of uncovering any hidden surprises from Marlin or at least having evidnce that they cannot easily 'ammend' in the future.

If the above approach fails, nothing will be lost. My action was on a timer though and waiting for more suggestions was not really an option. If and when this gets to the next stage I will definitely seek your advice before I do anything.

Thanks for being there.

[Joanna Connolly Solicitors]

Received PL2 from Ca bot today giving me 14 days to contact them or they 'will proceed as highlighted above'.

Is it now time to send SWID letter.

I'm quoting your Halifax post from your Diary thread on here to help put things in context as I'm not sure why you are sending a SAR to Cabot.

Assuming I've got the right debt your post says your last payment was in October 2012 and had been defaulted long before so it may become Statute Barred in October this year - only seven months to go.

This may be why it's raised its ugly head now if that's flagged up on Cabot's database. However if they're not aware then don't do anything which could make them aware.

You've also said you don't have a copy of the Default Notice which could be because one wasn't issued/served (or perhaps you mislaid it).

You need a SAR from Halifax asap so you know what really happened (not didn't happen) and when.

If it was assigned to Marlin then Cabot may have a problem since Marlin are unlicensed by the FCA.

If they intend to issue legal proceedings then under the new Pre Action Protocol (introduced 1st October 2017) they would need to send you a Letter Before Claim giving you 30 days' notice. At that point you can start to make a noise if it's appropriate.

Sometimes if you have enough legal arguments to work with it's best not to share the information with them because it gives them the opportunity to remedy the problem and then they issue the claim once they've sourced or reconstituted he documents they need.

This is the largest debt out of 14 for the wife and me.
We were with Payplan until 2010, then Kensington DMC until October 2012, have not paid anyone since (except kensington - to make excuses for us)


Halifax Credit Card

Date commenced May 1996

Approx balance £15,700

Date last paid full amount 2007

was on arrangement, not paid since 2012

Status DEFAULT 2007 ( i don't have a copy)

Account owner -marlin/cabot

Dec'12 I sent CCA request

Jan'13 I received T&Cs : niddy says

Jan I sent 'Terms & Conditions Received' template
Jan I received credit card application copy (they posted this before they received T&C template)
CCA has been emailed to Niddy
Feb' I received PPI claimback application (in response to my complaint)???? I will ignore for now.
Feb' I sent 'Missing PT' template,
Feb' I received PPI claimback response( even tho i made no such claim) it says "no ppi with this card"
March I received from Halifax cc 'transfer notice' to moocroft.
March I received from Moorcroft 'contact us in 7 days or else'
Mar' I re-sent 'Missing PT' template to HALIFAX
Mar' I sent 'IN DISPUTE' template to Moorcroft
April I received from Moorcroft 'DISCOUNT OFFER'
April I received from Moorcroft 'asking halifax about the DISPUTE'
July I received from moorcroft ' Halifax have fully responded (and refer to a letter from Halifax in March that I NEVER received) therefore debt still owed.
July I received from moorcroft ' to prevent possible further debt recovery action-etc.
Dec'2013 account sold to Merlin please contact within 5 days.
CCA request sent to marlin
Dec'2013 Marlin acknowedge and say will forward (they NEVER HAVE from what i can tell)
Jan'15 statement for last 6 months.
Feb'15 We have changed our name letter, now C a bot Financial.
Oct'17 begging letter from C a bot
Nov'17 another.
Jan'18 another
Jan'18 last 18 months statements (3)
Feb'18 threat o gram. contact us within 28 days from C a bot.
SAR to Halifax
We need your Signature for SAR from BoS
No signature required sent to BoS
threat o gram. contact us within 14 days from C a bot.
Mar'18 We need your Signature for SAR from BoS (no mention of my last letter)

Di

[The Tech Clerk]

no signature then they will no doubt send it back for signature as it is a regulated request,, by the way they have 40 days to respond and many leave to the very last minute, so do not rely on that although when got could give good info.

[CAPS ESC]

I'm not clear what you are trying to achieve by sending a SAR to anyone else for this account. Did you re-send the SAR to Halifax btw?

Simply tactical. I need to contact cabot before 7th March to avoid them potentially taking legal action. I do not want to put my cards on the table just yet with anything specific so a SAR would be a form of contact that would hopefully show that I would respond to an LBA and not keep schtum, so no possibility of a CCJ by default

BTW i have just sent a no sig. required for SAR letter to Halifax

[Still Waving]

Further to my post above (I don't want to keep editing the same post) - I see that you have already sent a SAR to Halifax in respect of one of the accounts, so I'm not clear what you are trying to achieve by sending a SAR to anyone else for this account. Did you re-send the SAR to Halifax btw?

[Still Waving]

I was just about to send the SAR to cabot and remembered that they also now own my MINT cc. so the question is Should i make this SAR account specific or even just aim it at Marlin through cabot or leave as is (all and sundry )? Does it not matter which ever way?

I think there are a couple of things you need to get clarified. The usual thing is to SAR direct to the firm whose records on you you want to get. Third parties are not included. Get another opinion on this. EDIT: Is it the ORIGINAL creditor whose records you want - ie the one you took out the agreement with? Marlin were, I assume, a debt purchaser at a later date. Same goes for the MINT account, ie it was sold on..

a SAR asks for all information a body holds regarding you, so if someone has more than one account of yours they are obliged to include all. There is no need for you to specify accounts. You will know when they send the info whether they have included all acccounts.

[CAPS ESC]

Sounds like a plan, I send a SAR to cabot including Marlin as the data keeper. This should serve as the 'contact us' that cabot are requesting.

I was just about to send the SAR to cabot and remembered that they also now own my MINT cc. so the question is Should i make this SAR account specific or even just aim it at Marlin through cabot or leave as is (all and sundry )? Does it not matter which ever way?

[CAPS ESC]

Sounds like a plan, I send a SAR to cabot including Marlin as the data keeper. This should serve as the 'contact us' that cabot are requesting.

[Roger]

You must be close to the BAR

My thinking is that the SWID should be on Marlin because of the chain of Credit Ownership! Avoiding Halifax (E as per Niddy's original opinion) . But if we could delay this it might get you closer to the BAR.
You could send for a SAR on Marlin Europe II (to the then OWNER) cost £10 curtesy of Cabot of course.

The Halifax SAR I think is really important here and you need this for forward planning.

[CAPS ESC]

Thanks Roger

My version says If you don't contact us within 14 days we will proceed as highlighted above. The vague bit is that nothing is really highlighted above.
It would be both interesting and informative to see what comes next, but we all know that they are quite likely to issue a claim if they think that they don't have any resistance.
I feel like i am playing poker with them. ps I am rubbish at gambling.